<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMG issues RFP: concrete syntax for UML action semantics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abstratt.com/blog/2008/10/15/omg-issues-rfp-concrete-syntax-for-action-semantics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abstratt.com/blog/2008/10/15/omg-issues-rfp-concrete-syntax-for-action-semantics/</link>
	<description>A company obsessed with one single goal: stopping people from writing so much code</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rafael.chaves</title>
		<link>http://abstratt.com/blog/2008/10/15/omg-issues-rfp-concrete-syntax-for-action-semantics/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>rafael.chaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstratt.com/blog/?p=122#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Stephen. It is an honor to have you posting here. Unfortunately, those URLs are all password protected, so I guess non-OMG members will only be able to see the final spec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Stephen. It is an honor to have you posting here. Unfortunately, those URLs are all password protected, so I guess non-OMG members will only be able to see the final spec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Mellor</title>
		<link>http://abstratt.com/blog/2008/10/15/omg-issues-rfp-concrete-syntax-for-action-semantics/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Mellor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstratt.com/blog/?p=122#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Initial submissions for an action language were published in September 2009.  (See http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/09-09-01, /09-08-01 and /09-08-02).  Final submissions are due in March 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initial submissions for an action language were published in September 2009.  (See <a href="http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/09-09-01" rel="nofollow">http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/09-09-01</a>, /09-08-01 and /09-08-02).  Final submissions are due in March 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafael.chaves</title>
		<link>http://abstratt.com/blog/2008/10/15/omg-issues-rfp-concrete-syntax-for-action-semantics/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>rafael.chaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstratt.com/blog/?p=122#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Doug, 

Action semantics is predated by many years by a handful of proprietary action language implementations (Kennedy Carter, Bridgepoint etc). I believe those now are implemented on top of UML action semantics or at least can be exported using UML AS.

As per practical use for action semantics, I have been busy working on that, more about this here later...

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, </p>
<p>Action semantics is predated by many years by a handful of proprietary action language implementations (Kennedy Carter, Bridgepoint etc). I believe those now are implemented on top of UML action semantics or at least can be exported using UML AS.</p>
<p>As per practical use for action semantics, I have been busy working on that, more about this here later&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://abstratt.com/blog/2008/10/15/omg-issues-rfp-concrete-syntax-for-action-semantics/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abstratt.com/blog/?p=122#comment-460</guid>
		<description>This is great news. While tool vendors could have defined a concrete syntax for action semantics, to my knowledge, no one has. I think it's time for the OMG to lend a hand and build a community around this so that they do have something.

I've blogged about this in the past, the action semantics are very powerful and are easy to apply to a massively multi-core world. All that's been missing is a practical way to use them. Hopefully this can help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news. While tool vendors could have defined a concrete syntax for action semantics, to my knowledge, no one has. I think it&#8217;s time for the OMG to lend a hand and build a community around this so that they do have something.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve blogged about this in the past, the action semantics are very powerful and are easy to apply to a massively multi-core world. All that&#8217;s been missing is a practical way to use them. Hopefully this can help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
